The Crash of AA Flight 587 - An Engineering Disaster?
Uploaded by: shitstinx
Video Description:
http://www.usread.com/flight587.html
http://usread.blogspot.com/
FDR and CVR data analyzed:
http://www.usread.com/flight587/TimeLinev2/TimeLinev2.html
"In regards to the wake turbulence, as stated earlier (in comments above for time stamp at 15:39), no weather data has been released by the NTSB to justify the postulation that 587 encountered wake turbulence at 15:39. To believe 587 encountered wake turbulence now, at 15:59 (the start of the rudder movements) is akin to black magic and witchcraft. And this is no exaggeration or sensationalistic claim. Here's why:
1. Pilots from many transport categories have mentioned to me that the way the NTSB has proffered the wake turbulence scenario is inconsistent with real world turbulence and inconsistent with the events that unfolded in the cockpit during those 20 seconds. For example: Why was there a 2nd rattle at 15:54 five seconds before the alleged second wake encounter at 15:59? Why did the pilot call for the escape procedure 13 seconds after the first wake encounter and 7 seconds before the next?
2. If the winds at at 9:15:59 am (the time of the alleged 2nd wake encounter) at 2400 feet (587's altitude according to the NTSB) were from the same general heading as they were at 7 am (approximately 330 degrees) it would mean that the wake vortices' distance to 587 would be over 1 nautical mile away. This would require a consistent 40 knot wind from 330 degrees! We haven't seen any supporting data. We don't see the Emperor's new clothes.
3. If the weather data suggests wind coming from the west (270 degrees) then this wake encounter is still impossible given the fact that JAL47 was at 3800 feet at that point, 1400 feet above where the NTSB says 587 was (at 2400 feet). That would require the wake vortices to fall at a rate of 933 feet per minute AND travel laterally at 28 knots. Dr. Fred Proctor, a wake turbulence expert with NASA's Langley Research Center, states that wake vortices fall at 300 to 480 feet per minute before they begin to decay. If we are generous to the wake encounter theory, and grant that the vortices did not decay at all during the 90 seconds and fell at a maximum rate of 720 feet over 90 seconds (while maintaining an eastward romp of 28 knots), the vortices would still be 680 feet above 587. Of course, the vortices would probably be higher since the vortices did experience some decay during the 90 second fall that would have slowed their descent below the max rate of 480 feet per minute, perhaps much slower. The Emperor is
naked."
Tags for this video: 587 aa587 airplane al conspiracy crash flight nstb queda sabotage terror trombettas turbulence wake
Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by shitstinx
| plane crash - seconds from disaster flight 587 | American Airlines Flug 191 - Chicago Aircrash | Tenerife Disaster - Second From Disaster |
 |  |  |
| VIDEO: Fatal AIRBUS CRASH caused by "Air Rage" | Columbias Last Flight Seconds from disaster | FSX - American Airlines Crash |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
have prevented the rudder from overextending
in the first place.
And a strong tailplane assembly securely
attached to the fuselage would not
have sheared off in the first place, even
if overstressed from overactuation of the
rudder.
Clear-cut software, mechanical and
structural design flaws. Airbus should
have had its pants sued out.
The Pilot aplying rudder imput in EXCESS...
I CAN´T FIND ANY NTSB Report were the PLANE´S STRUCTURE was to be BLAMED ARSEWHOLE...
THE ONLY CRAPPY PLANES THAT HAS HAD STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS TO DATE WAS AND IS THE BOEING 737, 500 PEOPLE KILLED ON 5 737 RUDDER RELATED CRASHES...
CHANGE THE TITLE IF THIS CRAPPY VID RETARD.
as to the title, i put a question mark at the end to denote that it might NOT be an "engineering disaster".
so take a chillpill man and get an understanding of the full context before you go calling people retards.
Wingtips DO NOT CREATE Turulences, but just the OPPOSITE...
The only thing that causes turbulences in a commercial airplane enough to diturb any other flight is just the Jetwash...
Aerodynamics is based on the principle of eficiency...not making disturbing (high drag) wings that affects the continuous airflow...
Even engines are designed having this principle as basic during the design of the fan blades...the bigger ones the less blade´s speed and less turbulences...
Me tard you smart...LOL
Birds having Wingtips...Yep..LOL
So a plane takes off from an airport, and the most dangerous turbulence is the one that allegedly is created by wingttips...instead of Fanblades VORTEXES created by engines being pulled at its MAX THRUST...
US TARDS...
watch?v=-p9LU3EKGao
And NOTICE the real creator of VORTEXES...and its REAL POWER.
TARD
Birds controls the turbulences of their wings due to the ending enge feaders...being the most efficient and natural way of controlling horizontal stability years ahead of any current airplane.
Don't bother with all of your "fanblade vortex" bullshit. You've lost all credibility.
US Tards...
Because God had to deliver...some things wrong...LOL
watch?v=__pyxPb6gMc
The problem of turbulences in commercial aviation is related with the Jetwash Effect= The Air leaving engine´s fan blades at great speed, take a look:
watch?v=-p9LU3EKGao
That´s the real problem AA Flight 587 had to overcome: pilots failed
Aerodynamics is based on the principle of eficiency
Engines are designed having this basic principle in mind during the design of the fan blades...the bigger the less fanspeed and less turbulence